Blog
Sector insights

Making sense of cyber attack costs: A sector by sector view

Published on
February 9, 2026

The cost of a cyber‑attack varies by company size and industry sector. Here are the patterns we found in research we conducted for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and why those patterns still matter today, even as the threat landscape evolves.

What might a cyber-attack cost your business?

If you are a large Information or Entertainment company, modelled costs can exceed £1m. Micro UK construction companies, on the other hand, may experience costs in the tens of thousands. Costs vary considerably depending on sector and organisational size.

We were recently commissioned by DSIT to analyse sector specific costs of cyber attacks in the UK, exploring how direct financial impacts differ by firm size and type of attack. While the underlying data reflects the best available sources at the time of the study, the structure and patterns we identified remain relevant for organisations thinking about their cyber risk exposure.

What did we find?

Our modelling estimated the average direct cost of a significant cyber‑attack for a UK business using the best available datasets at the time of the study. These averages were indicative, helping to show the relative impact between sectors, size bands and types of attacks.

When scaled based on the estimated proportion of UK businesses that experience a significant cyber‑attack, the modelling showed the macro‑economic impact can reach tens of billions of pounds annually, representing around 0.5% of UK GDP at the time of analysis.

More importantly, the study reinforced that the relative variation in cost is what matters most. Some sectors see consistently higher impacts due to digital intensity, operational interdependencies or data sensitivity. Others experience lower but still materialcosts per incident.

Although cyber incident datasets have expanded significantly in recent years, cost information is still recorded inconsistently across organisations and sectors, making modelled averages useful for indicating patterns and relative analysis rather than definitive price tags.

How likely is a cyber-attack on my business?

Estimating how often businesses experience damaging cyber incidents is challenging. Reporting practices vary, definitions differ, and many attacks never appear in public datasets. Even so, national trends give a useful indication of how common harmful incidents are.

The DSIT Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2024 found that:

  • 50% of UK businesses experienced some form of cyber attack or breach.
  • 13% of those incidents led to a negative outcome, such as operational disruption or financial loss.
  • This means around 6.5% of all UK businesses experienced a materially damaging cyber attack within a single year.

These headline figures show that cyber attacks with real impact are not rare, but the likelihood for any individual organisation varies significantly. Factors such as sector, digital footprint, critical systems, data sensitivity, reliance on third parties and the strength of existing controls all influence how exposed a business is to materially harmful events.

This is where CRI (Cyber Risk Insights) provides a more tailored and actionable view. Instead of relying on broad national averages, CRI combines global incident datasets, sector specific threat patterns and an organisation’s own environment to estimate the annual likelihood of impactful loss events. This modelling reflects the realities of your specific operating conditions not the “average UK business”.

By grounding likelihood in both external intelligence and internal context, CRI gives organisations a clearer view of which scenarios are most probable and most financially significant. This supports more informed prioritisation and investment decisions than generic survey statistics alone.

Find out more

Our DSIT report provides a breakdown of average costs by sector, organisation size and attack type, providing a baseline for understanding how cyber attack impacts vary across the UK economy.

The core message remains highly relevant: Cyber attacks carry real, measurable financial consequences and those consequences differ widely between organisations.

To understand the financial exposure specific to your own organisation, we encourage you to explore our Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Accelerator, which uses our Cyber Risk Insights (CRI) platform to generate clear, actionable financial insights in just six weeks.

Reach out to the team for a free demo, or if you want support with more confident, data‑driven cyber risk decision‑making.

Author
James Hanbury
Global Lead Director, Co-founder
James is the co-founder and Global Lead Director of CRI. He has spent over a decade working with cyber and risk teams, helping them bring more structure and clarity to how cyber risk is measured and communicated. James began building the earliest versions of CRI's models back in 2016, using Excel to explore how organisations could approach cyber risk in a more decision-focused way. That work has since grown into a SaaS-enabled capability now used by clients around the world. Based in London, James continues to work closely with CRI's clients and partners, focusing on how to make cyber risk quantification useful, explainable, and easier to adopt in practice.
Our blog

Latest Insights

The latest from the CRI community.
Resilience

The Future of MDR: From reactive monitoring to intelligence-led attack disruption

In today’s threat landscape, where attacks span identity, cloud, endpoint, data and third-party ecosystems, metrics such as alerts triaged, tickets closed and response times are no longer enough. What matters is whether an organisation can identify the threats that matter, disrupt them before they become business events, and use that insight to make better risk decisions.
Salil Shukla
June 2, 2026
4 min read
Resilience

Reinventing cyber budgeting: From legacy spend to quantified risk

Cyber risk is rising while budgets remain constrained. Investment in cyber has plateaued, yet the threat landscape continues to expand in frequency, sophistication, and impact. Despite this, many organisations continue to budget in the same way – rolling forward prior spend, adjusting incrementally, and reinforcing existing control environments. How is CRQ helping leaders prioritise investment, strengthen resilience, and stay ahead of a rapidly evolving threat landscape?
Martin Tyley
May 27, 2026
4 min read
Resilience

APT campaigns and their ripple effect on cyber risk

Advanced Persistent Threat groups are not typical cyber adversaries. Often nation-state sponsored, they operate with scale, sophistication, and patience. Their objectives extend well beyond financial gain – from espionage and intellectual property theft to preparing the ground for future disruption. See how organisations are using CRQ to understand the real impact of advanced threats—and prioritise investment accordingly.
Callum Wilson
May 26, 2026
4 min read

See CRI in action

Book a personalised demo and discover how CRI can help you make smarter cyber risk decisions.